Discussions are intensifying around defenseman Morgan Rielly and his uncertain future with the Toronto Maple Leafs. After 13 seasons in Toronto, Rielly, the longest-tenured player on the team, may be nearing the end of his time in the blue and white this off-season.
However, the prospect of a split isn’t straightforward, largely due to Rielly’s contract. At 32 years old, he is entering the fifth year of an eight-year deal that carries a cap hit of $7.5 million. Additionally, Rielly possesses a no-move clause, giving him significant control over any potential trade destination.
These complexities surrounding Rielly’s situation and contract will undoubtedly influence what the Maple Leafs could expect in return if they decide to move him this summer. To gauge the potential return, it’s helpful to look at recent trades involving notable defensemen with challenging contracts or trade protection.
A recent case that illustrates the impact of a no-move clause occurred before last year’s Olympic break when the New York Rangers traded Artemi Panarin to the Los Angeles Kings. Because Panarin had a say in his destination, the Rangers were compelled to accept a deal that might not have maximized their return had he not had trade protection.
Ultimately, New York secured a promising prospect in Liam Greentree, along with a third-round pick in 2026 and a fourth-round pick in 2028. While Panarin’s situation differs significantly—being on an expiring deal and a top-five scorer in the NHL over the last decade—it underscores how a no-move clause can limit a team’s leverage in trade negotiations.
There are various strategies teams can employ when trading a player with a no-move clause or an undesirable contract, with salary retention being a viable option. For example, the Florida Panthers successfully acquired defenseman Seth Jones from the Chicago Blackhawks during the 2024-25 season. Despite Jones’s declining performance and a hefty $9.5 million cap hit, the Panthers managed to facilitate the trade by having the Blackhawks retain $2.5 million of his salary, which allowed them to send goaltender Spencer Knight and a first-round pick in 2026 in return.
Although many teams may hesitate to retain salary on long-term contracts like Jones’s, which runs through the 2029-30 season, it’s a scenario that could also apply to Rielly, whose contract similarly extends through that timeframe.
Another relevant situation is that of Jacob Trouba, who was traded from the New York Rangers to the Anaheim Ducks. Trouba, who signed a seven-year, $8 million per season contract prior to the 2019-20 season, struggled to meet expectations, leading to questions about his value. Ultimately, he was moved to the Ducks, and New York received minimal compensation in return, securing only defenseman Urho Vaakanainen and a fourth-round pick in the 2025 draft.
The dynamics of trading a player like Rielly can vary widely. In some cases, both teams emerge satisfied from the deal, while in others, the team parting with a high-profile player may find itself constrained by a challenging contract or trade protection.
Note: This recap is an independently written summary based on publicly available reporting.
CIN
NYY
MIL
ATL
WSH
TB
SF
MIA
CHW
DET
STL
KC
CLE
HOU
TOR
CHC
SD
TEX
PIT
COL
MIN
ARI
LAA
OAK
BAL
LAD
BOS
SEA
NYM
PHI